Cekic progress and request for 2025 groundskeeper

Hi, i completed my 2024 term. Here below my progress report.

Management tasks ;

  • Agenda topics

  • Decision Logs chronologically updated

  • Meeting Notes transcribed all Year 2024 ( I divided sections and summarized/extracted and pointed out development topics for new onboarding contributers.)

  • Updated by Grin Community Counsil TO DO list and FOLLOW UPS.The results of decisions, choices, and state of the work completed at the time of the meeting are mostly reflected in this repository.

  • Approved Funded Requests tracking. I tracked regularly that the funded tasks are being carried out and it is kept up-to-date.

GRINCC Finance PR contribution;

Miscellanous;

GRIN News and Developments.

  • Published biweekly ,shared via Grin channels (reddit,twitter,Telegram,forum)
  • Contributing to Grincc/Hub and other documentation repository
  • Engaging Grin ecosystem, such as applying exchanges.

My request TL;DR
Term 2025 .This is a funding request for a full year period
Rate monthly /€1050.
My goal is to lay the groundwork for smoother decentralized decision-making and empower everyone to contribute even more. I believe that greater transparency and accountability will be crucial to ツ success.

With these tasks, the Grin Community will reach more potential contributers who don’t have the time or resources to stay informed on the latest Grin development.
I’m dedicated to making Grin more accessible, more transparent and i am open to taking on additional responsibilities as needed.

So far we couldnt manage but i will again press on that subject specifically.
I believe everyone in our community can be part of building Grin’s future.

Any member can propose bounty ideas , how to make grin better and, next step is to get approval from CC members.

I’ll be your dedicated voice, bringing your ideas and concerns directly to the CC or OC. I will be transparent and pass community requests to the members and bring you the outcome of it. Think of me as your direct line

Thanks all.

4 Likes

2024已经过去了,2025年刚刚开始,希望社区团结起来,展望未来,赋能实体经济

1 Like

I support this request.
However, I do want to remind you that as groundkeeper and CC representative you have an example role to others in this community. With greater power comes greater responsibility.
Stay posive, polite and constructive.
Facilitate and greeze the wheels of the governance machinary, keep continuity, but do not try to force things or they might break.
Appart from that, cary on like you have done so far👍.

2 Likes

This contract is news to me (still learning). Is the Meeting Notes transcription task work you do throughout the year as each meeting happens?

Also, regarding the tracking of the approved funding requests. Can you clarify the difference between these two:

Scilio Mwixnet Phase 3

Scilio Mwixnet Phase 3

Is there an ongoing and active/funded Mwixnet task, or is it complete?

I fear that Mwixnet is close, but like so many improvements in the past, it could stall before it crosses the finish line. Also, is there no funded payjoin task? My understanding was that the community thought this was the most urgent thing.

Yes, each meeting.

No difference, it was divided because there was a pause after phase 2. They are both the same.

There is no funded tasks for Mwixnet, it is completed but still at *testing* phase by community. It is supposed to integrate in GUI wallet but after GRIM wallet released, there is discussion/debate about getting integrate it to Grim.

Well, i hope not.

No funded task for payjoin, it is a topic for focus. So we should be open to funding for development.

1 Like

Like with everything grin, we just need capable and willing developers to work on it, the funding is there. And afterwards we need capable community members to test new features. We still need more testing for MWixnet and testing transaction contracts.

If you want to read more about Contract flow:
Grin-wallet contract prototype

1 Like

Kindly can you cast your votes as Grincc members ?
@trab
@Trinitron
@mcm-mike
@Mokhtar
@Neo

One initial thought is that many meetings are skipped or there is nothing to discuss. So the notes are just blank and posted up as blank.

The CC could meet less frequently and thus you’d also have less work to do. Meetings could be more meaningful that way as well.

Of course everyone still talks on the Keybase chat whenever they want, but the “official meetings” could be less frequent.

1 Like

Only 4 meeting is not done due to no participation
Rest is full.

I understand that meetings are usually not skipped entirely, but they’re often extremely uneventful. Like just saying “reminding everyone to help test this”.

Having too many uneventful meetings can also be a cause for lack of participation. People start to think that it’s not very important.

So I think it’s at least worth considering doing 2 meetings a month or even 1 meeting a month just to lighten the workload a bit and try something different.

1 Like

We already do 2 meetings a month. Least is already slowing decision-action.

I thought it was weekly lol. I’m there at that time every week anyway :joy:

Anyway, just some feedback; take it as you will. Even at the current cadence, there often isn’t much to discuss. Don’t want to add more work for you needlessly.

1 Like

@trab Well you are right that the workload regarding note-keeping and other administration is not much right now. Quite hard to predict though, it could change any time. For example when some in the community initiate “another drama” like has been done so often, the governance and admin load soars.
Quite sad though that we cannot even to manage biweekly meetings, even if just to share some thoughts informally.

We can and we do. If people don’t show up, it simply means they have nothing to add to the discussion and nothing new to report. This should be expected if the agenda is mundane.

@trab Back to the topic of this thread,
a) do you support this funding requests?
b) do you agree with the proposed amount?

The same question holds for:
@Trinitron
@mcm-mike or @renzokuken
@Mokhtar
@Neo

Just so everyone in and outside the CC is aware, CC meetings are biweekly on Keybase and they are as useful as we make them.
Meaning the more people are there, the more people make suggestions for agenda topics, the more useful they are. Otherwise they indeed become rather fruitless. In case everyone finds biweekly meetings to frequent, we could also move to 1 meeting a month, but frankly I do not think the frequency matter much until we get more CC members to commit to these meetings, even if just for informal discussion.

1 Like

a) yes!
b) yes!

I didn’t realize at first that the substack was also included in this.

And the desire for more transparency also makes this work very important.

2 Likes