Can you prove with certainty that Binance will list Grin? And ‘they funded two grin projects’ doesn’t mean they will beyond any doubt.
I don’t want to be that loser in 5 years sitting with a bag of grin, sobbing and repeating that @0xb100d said they will list Grin/they funded two projects and I don’t understand why they didn’t list yet.
@grinn I’m happy to donate my share to listing. Provided that the community isn’t taking @0xb100d approach of ‘I’m not gonna waste a penny, they will do it eventually’, then perhaps we can start making progress
Thanks for admitting that you were simply speculating and lacked any objectivity to back up your claims.
They listed bitcoin because bitcoin is the first and biggest cryptocurrency. It would be crazy for any exchange to try to even consider starting an exchange without having bitcoin. Listing bitcoin works in their own interests. Without bitcoin, any exchange is automatically worthless and can’t even dream of competing. This does not apply to Grin at present. Should an exchange list or not list Grin does not affect it’s viability at all.
Also, don’t compare Grin to bitcoin. Bitcoin is on a different planet. It is proven, established and so known that it has always been the undisputed King of everything crypto-related and leads every single alt coin (Grin included) in existence. It also has a community and awareness to match.
Bitcoin vs Grin comparisons:
Grin’s market share represents 1/3200th (0.03125%) of Bitcoin’s market share.
Grin’s current hashrate is 6.60 Mgps vs Bitcoins 45,867,201,622 GH/s.
If you want Grin to look insignificant and worthless, keep comparing it to bitcoin. You’ll get a healthy dose of reality regardless of whichever metric you use.
the difference between the number of people who have never used grin and those who’ve never used bitcoin is practically a rounding error.
bitcoin is unproven, and essentiallfy unknown and unused. in the grand scheme of things grin is about as popular as bitcoin as a form of digital money. It’s all relative.
well there are more than 50% of Americans that have heard of Bitcoin. I would guess that less than 1 bip (1/100 of a percent) already have heard of Grin.
some people in the community already think that we are as beautiful as bitcoin. while I understand that feeling we should all keep being humble and recognize that we basically proved almost nothing. we can be compared to ravencoin but certainly not to bitcoin. as least now.
this is very dangerous to be too confident as we can forget that usability, and the implementation of non interactive tx, will be very important if we want people to use this coin. the competition is very rude, and we have far more enemies than friends.
I actually mean to promote modesty. It is so early and an uphill battle, we need more developers and mathematicians so that grin is incontrovertably beautiful. Then every marketing/listing/usage effort will be as frictionless as possible urged on by the weight of good qualities. It can happen on it’s own naturally if it’s good.
Wow, your giving out advice about modesty now. What happened to Grin being the same as bitcoin. Seems like the recent event has changed your previous behavior of entitlement and snobbiness.
Also, this recent sudden hast rate surge of 50% almost ensures that no exchange will list grin unless active measures are immediately taken. You never know but maybe tomorrow this unknown person(s) may stage a serious attack.
It’s time to admit your wrong and adapt to reality
I’m not interested in proving I’m rigth and your wrong. The truth has already proved that.
I agree with you. We are a community coin so we are at a disadvantage compared to coins backed by companies. more listings would help push us further. Are wereally that special compared to others coins?
Chuckle …Your humour is appreciated. But, notwithstanding that the Grin face is nose-less, why cut off one’s proboscis to spite one’s visage? It’s a competitive cryptoscape out there and if Grin is to gain widespread adoption, it will need a lot of exposure. If a box needs to be ticked, it need not necessarily equate to selling out the family silver. I’d suggest that a binance listing is to be encouraged.
No jokes made, if enough people like you like the project they will list it out of self interest, imo no need to send an “official representative” and there shouldn’t be one in the first place. No core dev ever asked binance to list bitcoin.
I’d like to think that would be the case too but it’s different times now … there are 2730 cryptocurrencies in existence now according to investing.com … when Bitcoin was listed there was probably about 3!!! Enough people can only like the project if they hear about it. It needs more profile imo.
@newtownf1 is running the Grin Talk channel on YouTube. We need more stars like Newtown. Atleast we can further help enable him to get the message out to a wider public
Shhhhhuuuuuuuuurreeeee