1.Which one do you think is Satoshi Nakamoto?
2、Satoshi Nakamoto wants to be anonymous, whether the public should respect his wishes?He holds 1 million bitcoins, and if bitcoin becomes a global reserve asset, his will and actions will have a great impact on wealth, and whether he should disclose his identity for public interests？
3.If the growth of the market value of Grin Coin is as important as Bitcoin, then everyone will also look for who is igno.peverell.
After watching Money Electric, it seems pretty obvious that Todd wrote the initial code and then presented it to a small group that included Back who helped clean it up before launch. Todd’s defensiveness at the end, after being lighthearted for all the previous interviews, is pretty damning, as was Back’s complete silence and awkward composure during the final interview.
You have a lot of point, but I’m more inclined to Len Sassaman。
1、They all have similar British English expressions, such as bloody hard.bloody difficult,ect
2.It’s hard to imagine someone with hundreds of billions of dollars in wealth and not spenting a single penny.This is completely against human nature. Peter Todd is still young, he must have a lot of desires and consumption, he needs a lot of money, he has a plan to achieve his ideals, and he needs financial support; For example, I saw peter todd peaking on X that he firmly supported Ukraine, why not use his huge wealth to help Ukraine in distress?
If it’s Len Sassaman, it makes sense.He even doesn’t care about death, let alone money。and he has gone,as a result,no one used the huge wealth.
If I would be a betting man, I would say Len Sassaman is the best candidate for Satoshi, but he had at least two to three who helped him including Adam Back, perhaps Peter Todd and … any gues who this last person might be?
@011 I know you like to troll, but you have to reduce the number of links your posting or else it becomes spamm. Just to save you the time, yes I am Fed infiltrant trying yo censor you .
And this is not trolling, they burnt iraq down so they can prepare for this. Even a child knows you take the army whole.
In this, or another of his docs, Curtis talked about a West German police officer who was dealing with some communist group. His essay asked something along the lines of where are the modern day barbarians. As in those in the cities.
Well, some barbarians are about to meet some real killers.
As a lawyer, I know that objective facts are not the same as legal facts，the lagal fact is that Craig Wright is not Satoshi Nakamoto.
The Court’s decision specifically states:
Craig Wright is not the author of the Bitcoin whitepaper. Craig Wright is not the copyright owner of the Bitcoin whitepaper. Craig Wright was not the one who was active under the name Satoshi Nakamoto between 2008 and 2011. Craig Wright is not the creator of Bitcoin. Craig Wright was not the author of the original version of the Bitcoin software.
In May 2016, Gavin Andresen, the core developer of Bitcoin, said: "This guy is very knowledgeable about Bitcoin and the early days of Bitcoin. My conversation with him via email was like my communication with Satoshi Nakamoto at work. This made me start to believe that he was Satoshi Nakamoto. ”
maybe the lagal fact is that Craig Wright is not Satoshi Nakamoto,but objective fact is that Craig Wright probably the last person helped Satoshi Nakamoto, so he is familiar with early Bitcoin
That shows at least that Back knows Satoshi.
