Unfortunately at this moment it is not possible to log reactions to messages as explained here. I will rewrite the proposal in which instead of reaching configurable number of reactions to message to get withdrawal approved there will be a required number of responses to that message (for instance containing particular emoji etc).
Cool, maybe some community members can make design suggestions for the avatar of Slateboy, would that be ok for you @renzokuken or do you want the ‘honor’ of giving Slateboy a face?
A first concept of a gameboy, slatepack and delivery man inspired mascot.
Still a bit much gameboy though. I Could also replace the body with an envelope/slatepack. Alternatively, a more blockish/pixelated design or minecraft like character could be fun .
Still a lot of room for improvement on the concept
Actually, while we are at it, maybe Slateboy should show the contract flow
Nice way to educate everyone
Signature 1 Signature 2
| Send Contract => |
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
| <= Sign contract ✅ |
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
| Sign and publish ✅ ✅ => |
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
The above but than more graphical, with all text and checks in large arrows representing the three steps.
Nice idea! I like “send” and “sign”, another option could be “SRS” and “RSR” which are the two slatepack flows sender-receiver-sender and receiver-sender-receiver.
Is the transaction flow below clear/useful? If so I can put it in the body, I will keep the screen/face, but make it smaller and put the Grin ツ as face.
In the body I can put the transaction flow. Optionally, we can make three versions where Slateboy points to the phase of the transaction the user is in.
For me this is the clearest way to visualize the transaction flow.
I think this graphic is very useful to understand what is going on, but I would also include info what command has been called in the grin-wallet
→ Send: Draft contract
← Receive: Sign contract
→ Finalize: Sign & broadcast
what do you think?
I agree, it might be useful to name the commands. Not sure if the commands are the same though for the transaction flow suggested by @oryhp. I did not have time to try it yet. But yes, using the names/commands should make it even more clear.
Dude, this is amazing! I like it so much I am offering you 500ツ from my bounty for this initiative. Regardless if you decide to continue or not, feel free to drop me your slatepack address in DM or here in the forum up to your preference!
I never say no to free Grinnies , I will DM you.
I am still far away from my target of 86400 ツ (1 Grin day).
Suggestions for improvement are welcome. I will make also three more designs where SLATEBOY points to which phase of the transaction the user is at.