This implies democracy, possibility only in america, but that exact wording is an Americanism of old documents.
Presumably you don’t plan to bend down and take it if america declares non-dollar currencies to be a threat to democracy. And mob rule isn’t the plan anyway.
“for anyone marginalized” could be better wording
There is still no true peer-to-peer-based electronic cash system. Previous efforts allow for surveillance and tracking
Don’t drop “true” as a criticism of different projects making different trade offs.
“we will extend privacy further then other projects” or something like that
I’m not a believer in the 1000 coin future, but I think the count will likely be 5 to 7 ish; I would not promote purity at any point.
It safeguards freedom and democratic values
Again, don’t rely on democracy. Nation states have control of the word and may not like stateless currency.
Freedom is a filler word, its well known to mean different things to different people.
governments
States.
They are interchangeable to the general public, but your building a state-less currency you should appeal to my terminology as the crazy extremists is such minor ways.
governance is collective decision making, states are organizations that claim a monopoly on violence over a geographical area.
Currency is a form of governance it wouldn’t make sense if your anti-governance, and governance is light and friendly sounding; while states are vile evil.