In support of this funding.
Just to improve my understanding, is this is different from adding another level of derivation to the keys you use for each address, e.g. going from m/44’/0’/0’/c to m/44’/0’/0’/c/i?
What is the current situation for Grin++ and grin-wallet. Does Grin uses a new key as blinding factor for each transaction, or just one key for all transactions?
One reason why I want to understand this better is because I think this also is related to on one of the community projects ideas, creating an Airdrop workflow.
So e.g. generating one time use keys to which you send some Grin for an airdrop. Users can self spend, send the transaction to their own wallet upon scanning. After e.g. 1 year, you reclaim any unclaimed airdrops from your airdrop account.
Alternatively special airdrop seed phrases could be used, e.g. 12 word seed phrases. Only in this case it might be harder to manage and reclaim unclaimed airdrops, unless we use something like BIP84
This is a bit off-topic since no new slatepack addresses are needed to self spend an airdrop, but it does relate much to the derivation sheme used by the wallet. Best to consider all future uses.