Chart showing chainsize growth rate (in terms of size of historical 2-input 2-output tx / 100 bytes)
versus privacy leaks. CT=Confidential Transactions. MW=Mimblewimble. RingCT=CT+ring signatures.
Lelantus would sit at 46 (x 100 bytes) for the BEAM implementation (both inputs and outputs shielded).
Privacy leaks
amounts+ |
addresses+ | BTC
i/o-links |
|
|
addresses+ | CT
i/o-links |
|
i/o-links |MW
|
decoys | RingCT
none | Zk-SNARK
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 growth rate