True, but I don’t think we want to separate those steps in practice. We currently call the last step “finalize,” but I think “complete” or “completar” (in Spanish) is more in line with what the last step really means. It should be a trade-off, I don’t believe those 10 principles are the 10 Commandments, but I have seen these principles put into practice and the results are surprisingly positive.
Let me be more specific.
Sender creates the transaction:
$ grin-wallet transaction draft
(the output is an incomplete slate or draft)
Recipient accepts the transaction:
$ grin-wallet transaction accept
(the input here is an incomplete slate or draft)
(the output is a partially signed transaction, is not a draft because it is “reviewed” and then “accepted”)
Sender completes the transaction:
$ grin-wallet transaction complete
(the input is a partially signed transaction)
In the last step the transaction is finalized or “completed”, which means “signed by sender and broadcasted”.
This could be also well translated into a GUI based on a more intuitive API. If SRS and RSR is unified this also applies. Then we could have one single consistent flow: Draft - Accept - Complete or DAC.