# \[Withdrewed\] Request for Funding @davidtavarez: One-time use Slatepack addresses for Wallet (RFC and Grin++ Implementation) **URL:** \ **Category:** Governance\ **Created:** [April 6, 2021, 8:50pm UTC](https://forum.grin.mw/t/withdrewed-request-for-funding-davidtavarez-one-time-use-slatepack-addresses-for-wallet-rfc-and-grin-implementation/8707 "2021-04-06T20:50:36Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 1\ **Showing post:** 56
**Author:** ![Anynomous](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex036/user_avatar/forum.grin.mw/anynomous/32/2928_2.png) [@Anynomous](https://forum.grin.mw/u/Anynomous)\ **Post date:** [June 11, 2021, 2:30pm UTC](https://forum.grin.mw/t/withdrewed-request-for-funding-davidtavarez-one-time-use-slatepack-addresses-for-wallet-rfc-and-grin-implementation/8707/56 "2021-06-11T14:30:35Z")
@dog We will keep going, with all characters and differences in attitudes that enrich the grin community and ecosystem 💪 For anyone who wants to help push “one-time use addresses” to implementation, feel free to contribute to the RFC I just created 😁 🙏: > [@Grin HD wallet & One time use addresses RFC](https://forum.grin.mw/t/grin-hd-wallet-one-time-use-addresses-rfc/9028): > > I want to create this topic to further discuss the details of the “One time use addresses” idea created by @davidtavarez. Basically this idea need to be extended to create a standard on how Grin HD (hierarchical deterministic wallets) should function: We could assign it a GIPXX number (e.g. GIP44), just like how BIP (Bitcoin Improvement Proposals) work. With Grin HD wallets here are additional concerns that should be taken into account: 1) security 2) wallet performance 3) blockchain bloat 4… --- _[View the full topic](https://forum.grin.mw/t/withdrewed-request-for-funding-davidtavarez-one-time-use-slatepack-addresses-for-wallet-rfc-and-grin-implementation/8707)._