# Request for funding @gene (Adaptor signature atomic swaps GRN-BTC)

**URL:** <https://forum.grin.mw/t/request-for-funding-gene-adaptor-signature-atomic-swaps-grn-btc/8632>\
**Category:** Governance\
**Created:** [March 20, 2021, 9:48pm UTC](https://forum.grin.mw/t/request-for-funding-gene-adaptor-signature-atomic-swaps-grn-btc/8632 "2021-03-20T21:48:00Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 24

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![gene](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/g/43a26b/32.png) [@gene](https://forum.grin.mw/u/gene)\
**Post date:** [October 20, 2021, 4:58am UTC](https://forum.grin.mw/t/request-for-funding-gene-adaptor-signature-atomic-swaps-grn-btc/8632/24 "2021-10-20T04:58:57Z")

</div>

I can go over your comments, doing a partial rewrite to clarify the issues you brought up.

I really need to re-review the Succinct Atomic Swap protocol again. The fact that one failure path leaves one party with the traded funds, and the other funds burned doesn’t sit right with me. Maybe there are things about the game theory I’m not taking into account.

Either way, I need to take a deeper read of the spec.

---

_[View the full topic](https://forum.grin.mw/t/request-for-funding-gene-adaptor-signature-atomic-swaps-grn-btc/8632)._