# Proposal: Grin Governance Iteration **URL:** \ **Category:** Governance\ **Created:** [June 12, 2019, 6:47pm UTC](https://forum.grin.mw/t/proposal-grin-governance-iteration/5191 "2019-06-12T18:47:28Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 1\ **Showing post:** 11
**Author:** ![condiosluzverde](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex036/user_avatar/forum.grin.mw/condiosluzverde/32/827_2.png) [@condiosluzverde](https://forum.grin.mw/u/condiosluzverde)\ **Post date:** [June 18, 2019, 11:00am UTC](https://forum.grin.mw/t/proposal-grin-governance-iteration/5191/11 "2019-06-18T11:00:17Z")
I approve of the governance proposal, and my response is based on the structure and recommendations it includes. I apologize if this is redundant or obvious. As a comnunity member, I support this proposal as-is for the initial governance next step. I recommend and suoport that either the council or the core team delegate to a small group (I recommend exactly 3) the folliwing tasks: 1. Define and publish first revision of RFC process. Call it RFC #0. 2. Draft and shepheard (sponsor?) RFC #1 to implement the governance proposal here, using the RFC #0 process (which, of course, would bring in wider participarion via whatever means are defined in RFC #0). All other suggestions, related or unrelated may progress forward here in the forum until RFC #s 0 and 1 are adopted, and subsequently flow through the RFC process. I further recommend that the adoption of RFC #0 be time-boxed to prevent possible delays from any attempt to create the perfect RFC #0. I have significant trust in the current leadership/council as evidenced by their achievements thus far. I believe the open RFC process/concept has perhaps the best track record for ensuring that open distributed systems retain a steady and healthy emergent growth and evolution. Respectfully, -james aka qxotk aka condios luz verde --- _[View the full topic](https://forum.grin.mw/t/proposal-grin-governance-iteration/5191)._