# Miner Benchmarks - What is currently the best Grin miner? **URL:** \ **Category:** Mining\ **Created:** [February 24, 2019, 5:47pm UTC](https://forum.grin.mw/t/miner-benchmarks-what-is-currently-the-best-grin-miner/4238 "2019-02-24T17:47:29Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 1\ **Showing post:** 3
**Author:** ![tromp](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex036/user_avatar/forum.grin.mw/tromp/32/22_2.png) [@tromp](https://forum.grin.mw/u/tromp)\ **Post date:** [February 24, 2019, 6:59pm UTC](https://forum.grin.mw/t/miner-benchmarks-what-is-currently-the-best-grin-miner/4238/3 "2019-02-24T18:59:26Z")
> [@garetjax](#): > > Please share if you can: OS, CPU, Miner including Version, Video Card, C29/C31, and your hashrate. You’ll want fidelity as well; preferably something like fidelity\_24\_42 for increased accuracy. See > [@Request for all miner devs; use Fidelity](https://forum.grin.mw/t/request-for-all-miner-devs/2271/10): > > Yes, this would be an excellent option to support in miners. There is a slight tradeoff there, since shorter cycles tend to have higher fidelities, so while we want take some shorter lengths into account to reduce variance, we don’t want to include much shorter lengths that would move the expectation too much. I propose to do as in which obtains a fidelity over the 10 cycle lengths from 24 up to 42. For clarity let’s call this fidelity\_24\_42. If miners could provide this metric that would… --- _[View the full topic](https://forum.grin.mw/t/miner-benchmarks-what-is-currently-the-best-grin-miner/4238)._