# Grin-Bitcoin Adaptor Signature Atomic Swap update thread

**URL:** <https://forum.grin.mw/t/grin-bitcoin-adaptor-signature-atomic-swap-update-thread/8689>\
**Category:** Development and Technical Discussion\
**Created:** [April 2, 2021, 7:17pm UTC](https://forum.grin.mw/t/grin-bitcoin-adaptor-signature-atomic-swap-update-thread/8689 "2021-04-02T19:17:00Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 11

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![tromp](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex036/user_avatar/forum.grin.mw/tromp/32/22_2.png) [@tromp](https://forum.grin.mw/u/tromp)\
**Post date:** [May 15, 2021, 7:13am UTC](https://forum.grin.mw/t/grin-bitcoin-adaptor-signature-atomic-swap-update-thread/8689/11 "2021-05-15T07:13:58Z")

</div>

> [@gene](#):
>
> or on the RFC

Is there a high level overview of your succinct atomic swap protocol yet that you can share, that shows the role of this “atomic nonce” ?

Would it be reasonable to extend it to 64 bits and not bother with any filter since the odds of reuse would be too small?

---

_[View the full topic](https://forum.grin.mw/t/grin-bitcoin-adaptor-signature-atomic-swap-update-thread/8689)._