# Fund Alternative: Another Split Fund Proposal

**URL:** <https://forum.grin.mw/t/fund-alternative-another-split-fund-proposal/8477>\
**Category:** Uncategorized\
**Created:** [February 26, 2021, 12:52pm UTC](https://forum.grin.mw/t/fund-alternative-another-split-fund-proposal/8477 "2021-02-26T12:52:49Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 5

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Anynomous](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex036/user_avatar/forum.grin.mw/anynomous/32/2928_2.png) [@Anynomous](https://forum.grin.mw/u/Anynomous)\
**Post date:** [March 9, 2021, 9:50am UTC](https://forum.grin.mw/t/fund-alternative-another-split-fund-proposal/8477/5 "2021-03-09T09:50:14Z")

</div>

> [@dog](#):
>
> I do not support the Grin++ team having full autonomy to manage the funds

Would you support a higher amount of ‘allocated’ money (so not send), if it would be managed and be part of the fund for the Community Council, so much broader representation than just Grin++?

In my opinion Grin++ should simply be part of the ‘Community Council’, and the community council might have a significant amount of money allocated to it, but only receive it when requests are actually coming in. To make another large multi-Sig wallet holding large parts of the fund before any actual request are y coming in only provides more risk and overhead,

---

_[View the full topic](https://forum.grin.mw/t/fund-alternative-another-split-fund-proposal/8477)._