# Fund Alternative: A Split Fund Proposal

**URL:** https://forum.grin.mw/t/fund-alternative-a-split-fund-proposal/8476
**Category:** Uncategorized
**Created:** [February 26, 2021, 12:51pm UTC](https://forum.grin.mw/t/fund-alternative-a-split-fund-proposal/8476 "2021-02-26T12:51:39Z")
**Posts on this page:** 1
**Showing post:** 2

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![tromp](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex036/user_avatar/forum.grin.mw/tromp/32/22_2.png) [@tromp](https://forum.grin.mw/u/tromp)
#### Post date: [February 26, 2021, 1:07pm UTC](https://forum.grin.mw/t/fund-alternative-a-split-fund-proposal/8476/2 "2021-02-26T13:07:48Z")

</div>

We would require the second fund to also subscribe to the  
“Appropriate and inappropriate uses of the Grin Development Fund” section [1]  
but allow them to deviate on “Request for Funding Process” and " Decision Process" as they see fit.

I would omit the “33BTC can be split to smaller groups”.  
My intention is that both funds are general purpose, i.e. open to any funding request as deemed appropriate in [1], rather than limited to specific projects.

[1] [grin-rfcs/0014-general-fund-guidelines.md at master · mimblewimble/grin-rfcs · GitHub](https://github.com/mimblewimble/grin-rfcs/blob/master/text/0014-general-fund-guidelines.md)

---

_[View the full topic](https://forum.grin.mw/t/fund-alternative-a-split-fund-proposal/8476)._