# Any asic-love and inflation-hate around?

**URL:** <https://forum.grin.mw/t/any-asic-love-and-inflation-hate-around/232>\
**Category:** Market\
**Created:** [February 27, 2018, 10:47am UTC](https://forum.grin.mw/t/any-asic-love-and-inflation-hate-around/232 "2018-02-27T10:47:10Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 10

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![jnash1729](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/j/278dde/32.png) [@jnash1729](https://forum.grin.mw/u/jnash1729)\
**Post date:** [March 4, 2018, 9:57pm UTC](https://forum.grin.mw/t/any-asic-love-and-inflation-hate-around/232/10 "2018-03-04T21:57:55Z")

</div>

It’s not just range proofs (I said “and aggregating transactions in a verifiably secure way”). The choice of using Schnorr signatures is what would eventually mitigate abuse of the protocol–

> [@Much of the technology behind Grin](https://forum.grin.mw/t/much-of-the-technology-behind-grin/127/1):
>
> A different signature scheme from ECDSA that, as far as Grin is concerned, provides multi-signatures, smaller signature sizes and improves security. But most importantly, it paves the way for certifiable transactions and scriptless scripts.

---

_[View the full topic](https://forum.grin.mw/t/any-asic-love-and-inflation-hate-around/232)._