# An open discussion on Non-interactive transactions

**URL:** <https://forum.grin.mw/t/an-open-discussion-on-non-interactive-transactions/8510>\
**Category:** Development and Technical Discussion\
**Created:** [March 3, 2021, 5:16am UTC](https://forum.grin.mw/t/an-open-discussion-on-non-interactive-transactions/8510 "2021-03-03T05:16:51Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 102

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![trab](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/t/f04885/32.png) [@trab](https://forum.grin.mw/u/trab)\
**Post date:** [June 2, 2022, 5:26pm UTC](https://forum.grin.mw/t/an-open-discussion-on-non-interactive-transactions/8510/102 "2022-06-02T17:26:00Z")

</div>

> [@Doogevol](#):
>
> I would like it more to integrate this into the existing slatepack protocol and wallets, than to include slatepacks into existing messaging protocols like matrix and xmmp or applications like keybase

Tightly coupling wallets to a specific messaging protocol increases size of codebase, increases things that can break, decreases decentralization and freedom. But it could be a faster solution…

Leaving it agnostic in terms of which messaging protocol it uses would probably remain the best option in terms of freedom.

In any case, [there are](https://forum.grin.mw/t/grin-messaging-app/7517) [some threads](https://forum.grin.mw/t/venmo-cashapp-product-planning/9714) [about this](https://forum.grin.mw/t/grin-product-wishlist/9704)

---

_[View the full topic](https://forum.grin.mw/t/an-open-discussion-on-non-interactive-transactions/8510)._